Raidernews MorningStar
NEW RAIDERNEWS HOME |  Message Boards |  Site Stats |  Calendar |  Links |  Polls |  Account Information |  Personalize |  Logout
   

Paint It Black by Alex Chavez







The Pink Elephant



I want to be an optimist, want to believe that this year will be different. Somehow the Raiders will win some games, right? JaMarcus Russell will be just good enough; the rushing attack will once again be in the NFL’s top 10, and the defense will play solid enough to win 7 or 8 games, producing promise heading into 2009.

Yet there’s the same humungous pink elephant in the room that has camped out here since 2004, and it continues to dampen my hopes for this season. Who is the team’s pink elephant? The absense of a run-stuffing defensive tackle.

In the early 2000s, when Oakland was dominating the AFC West, the team trotted out Darrell Russell, Grady Jackson, John Parrella, and Sam Adams. Thou shalt not run on us. The run defense was consistently in the top 12, and Oakland enjoyed playing meaningful games in December and January.

This year? Tommy Kelly, Terdell Sands, and Gerrard Warren. The problem? We had this exact same trio to begin last season. They were absolutely shredded week after dreadful week. I tried to find an excuse.

“Well, Tommy Kelly was hurt last year!” Unfortunately, I looked at the numbers that the opposing rushing offenses hung on us during the first seven games of the 2007 season (Kelly was injured during game 7). So what did Kelly help the Raiders achieve during that timespan? Here is how each opposing offense fared in their rushing attack weeks 1 through 7.






Vs Detroit 5.1 avg. 108 yards

At Broncos 4.8 181

Vs Browns 4.6 88

At Dolphins 7.1 141

At Chargers 6.4 206

Vs Chiefs 3.9 126

At Titans 5.3 192

Yikes. The Raiders defense allowed an awful 5.3 yards per carry. At the end of the season, Oakland’s defense had the worst yards-allowed-per-carry at 4.8 So the team was even MORE horrible with Kelly in there. And, as we all know, neither the peronnel nor the scheme have changed between then and now.

Well, could Terdell Sands have a better season this year? Unlikely, as he’s already had his knee drained this preseason and missed practice time due to its problems. When he did practice, the results weren’t that impressive. This week, Kiffin prodded Sands: “Push yourself Sands, push yourself!” Guys who know they’re an integral part to the team’s success should not need to be motivated by coaches. If Sands was ready to become the force we need him to be, he would be eating Jake Grove and Robert Gallery for lunch every practice.

This Friday’s game versus the run-oriented Titans team should be a good measuring stick for the Silver and Black’s run defense. Chris Johnson’s speed, Lendale White’s power, and Vince Young’s elusiveness are enough to give any defense fits. If our guys don’t kick down the door and make a statement, our best hope for 2008 will be that our offense exceeds expectations, takes early leads in games, and makes opponents play catch up through their passing attack. For all we know, drafting Darren McFadden may have been our best move at shoring up the porous run defense. One way or another, Friday night lights will shine the truth.

So what are your thoughts, Nation? What is our hope for the 2008 Raider run defense? Is the defensive tackle position priority number one as we look forward to a possible 2009 playoff season?

Alex

Contact Alex



More Stories From Alex

Knock, Knocking on McFadden's Door

Oakland's 5 Choices Today?

How Good is Justin Fargas?

Knock, Knocking on McFadden's Door



Raider DVD's

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.raidernews.com/x/trackback.php?id=200808150604424

No trackback comments for this entry.
Paint It Black by Alex Chavez | 6 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Paint It Black by Alex Chavez
Authored by: SR Raider on Friday, August 15 2008 @ 09:45 AM CDT
Please don't kick me while I'm down. The run D is almost certainly going to be a major disappointment. 1-2 more years to rebuild this team.

Ah well, we'll still be a lot better than last year thanks to Wilson.
the run O could be great
Authored by: SR Raider on Friday, August 15 2008 @ 10:04 AM CDT
Had to repost this from Jerry McDonald at the Oakland Tribune:

"Running back Darren McFadden began to show signs of physical and mental fatigue in the last few practices, but this is the best looking Raiders rookie I’ve seen since the club returned to Oakland in 1995"

Hell yeah. That sounds gooooood.
Come on
Authored by: AlbDaRaiders on Friday, August 15 2008 @ 11:28 AM CDT
Was Tommy Kelly in at DT or DE? Thank you!! The main reason for the numbers looking the way they did in 2007 was due to our poor tackling safeties missed tackle that went for long runs and Warren Sapp not retiring. I was on this site last damn summer saying he is done and we needed to slice him. There is an article on the internet about him being the worse in the league. Go check it out. Kelly will be in Sapp's spot not at RDE.....where he should never be at. Sands is cool man. He didn't give a damn because he couldnt get past his mom's death hence the out of shape uninspired play we saw. Raiders are beyond fine at DT just you watch.
Paint It Black by Alex Chavez
Authored by: lilraider on Friday, August 15 2008 @ 11:57 AM CDT
Kelly at DE last year was mostly single-teamed due to the presence of Burgess. So Kelly being single-blocked was still part of the run defense problem. Now that he'll be getting more attention inside, it's going to be ok?

If Sapp was replaced by a huge run-plugger, then I'd be opomistic. Being replaced by a former DE who couldn't stop the run outside, had light knee surgery, and as Jerry McDonald put it "has a ways to go in terms of conditioning, as witnessed by his feeble yet comic attempt at taking a lap the other night after being called for offsides" just doesn't fill me with confidence.

Gibril will help, but the run D starts up front.
Im optimistic
Authored by: ProBowl52 on Friday, August 15 2008 @ 01:08 PM CDT
We all saw camp photos of Sapp last year at a slim 285lbs vs. the 330lbs he was at in 2006 when he had 10 sacks. Sapp was a non factor on our line last year against the run and the pass, and yes Kelly at DE was not made to rush the passer but stop the run and we sucked at it. Kelly is heavier and stronger this year and should play at 315lbs vs. Sapps 285 last year. Sands is already in 100% better shape than he was last year and looked like a beast to me when he ran down field 30 yards to recover Routts fumbled INT against the 49ers. Sands was close to 390 last year I believe Jerry wrote and probably more around 340-350 this year which should return him to 2006 form. Word is also that Warren has been playing pretty well so far. I would not count this D-line out this year as the reshuffling will be good for them just like the reshuffling in the secondary will only benefit our defense as well. Wilson in the box and Kelly at the 3-technique makes us better already I think.
Paint It Black by Alex Chavez
Authored by: trsohbet on Sunday, November 02 2008 @ 05:07 PM CST
Thank you very much for this information. sohbet muhabbet mirc sevgi


Enter to Vote for Morning Star!!!






Enter to Vote for Morning Star!!!

Rank Raidernews:









The powerful engine used by this site has been fueled with the high octane development at Geeklog.net. This site is independently published and designed by the fans. We are a grassroots alliance of fans and attached to the original "Powered by Fans" network at SPORTSINFINITY. Copyright 1997-2009